Friday, September 2, 2011

Recently I have argued to my friends and family that right now more than any time in America's history, apathy is at its highest. There are still wars going on in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya even though we as a collective society have identified that these wars are a detriment to our future growth. Corporations are making record profits in a time when unemployment is at 9%. Our journalism institutions are outraged at Wikileaks even though these same institutions are being slowly disassembled by the powers Wikileaks are providing checks against. In theory, the middle and lower classes should be outraged at the exploitative nature of our government and corporations, yet there is not much being done to organize and seriously react. The London Riots were something of a push back, but anarchy only leads to the upper classes feeling reinforced in their views that their privileged ways are more humane. Astonishingly, the people who are organizing in America are the people who qualify as the dominant class in Kirk and Okazawa-Rey's graph. So, what is the problem in America today? Are we implicitly letting the wealthy get away with exploitation? Or are we so socialized to social injustice in America that our apathy is a product of the institutions that make up our society? I hope it is the latter.

In Harro's "Cycle of Socialization," the most important part other than understanding how our institutions and culture socialize us to conform to the dominant culture is the idea that there is a "direction for change" or a "movement towards liberation." In order to start a path toward this liberation, Harro believes that we need "something [to make] us begin to think, to challenge, to question the system." Unfortunately in America, the catalyst to get us to start thinking like that is a neglected and unequal public school system. As the situation stands, the most underfunded school districts are in the most poverty-stricken and oppressed areas. It is no wonder students drop or go on to join gangs because with poorly accommodated school systems and very little opportunity for jobs, kids are alienated and see that education provides them with no future. As a country, we need to value education over profits and see that neither the teachers nor the kids are the problem because poor public schooling is a symptom of a larger institutional problem.

If the public education system has failed minorities as a catalyst for organizing, then an outside influence needs to step up, but who can we/they rally around as inspirational figures if there are a lack of them in our society? It seems that our generation has no Malcolm X's, Martin Luther King Jr.
's, Cesar Chavez's, Muhattama Ghandi's, Harvey Milk's, Gloria Steinem's, James Baldwin's, Spike Lee's, or Chuck D.'s to carry on a tradition of social justice within oppressed and minority groups (Sure, we have President Obama, but how much actual social justice has he provided/inspired during his Presidency? Not all of that is his fault though). This is in part because our education system is so bad and undervalued, but it is also because of the vilification of these types of more "radical" or outspoken people in the media. The vilification not only comes from individuals like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity, but it also comes from the larger problem of for-profit media. In today's society, a Spike Lee film or a Public Enemy album does not sell because people do not want to see the harsh reality around them. The majority of the market only wants to watch or listen or read about inconsequential things. Because of this, people who have messages like David Simon (the Wire, Generation Kill, Treme) or Spike Lee or Chuck D. are pushed to the fringes and are not as widely viewed or heard as they should be. 

If we do not have inspirational leaders who provide that catalyst towards a "movement of liberation" coming from education, politics, or art where do we find them? To be honest, I have no clue and would love to hear other peoples' takes on this (although that may be a cop out, I am admittedly cynical myself and feel we are so entrenched in this individualist/capitalist society we will have trouble finding solutions).



2 comments:

  1. I think you are so right about education. Education is so crucial. It's almost like the power class has stupified education to the point that these next few generations won't have the knowledge they need to stand up and fight for what's right. This country doesn't seem to value education at all. Thus, we are not churning out any M.L. Kings of our own. Society has broken down to the point that it's easier to give up and let others make the decisions. Take Austin for example, rent is outrageous jobs are minimal. This is a student town without actual students. We're all part of the system trying to find jobs to make money to support ourselves to try and afford college so much so that it sometimes doesn't seem worth it to finish school. I mean, heck, how are we going to pay all our student debts back if there are no jobs? It shouldn't be so hard for this country's youth to get an education at any level. If education was better valued and more readily available to everyone, then I believe we could move forward as a better educated and more productive society.
    -Krystal Hasselmeier

    ReplyDelete
  2. Like you, I do feel that apathy lies thick nowadays. An entertainment and pleasure-driven culture, while not the cause of apathy, has a way of numbing our consciousness and keeping us satisfied with quick fixes. I love Martin Luther King's quote "If a man hasn't discovered something that he will die for, he isn't fit to live." This is a man and part of a generation who better knew the meaning of this because they discovered a cause, a hope that was worth a cost. MLK wanted to leave something for the generations to come. I feel like this generation hardly gives a thought to the next generation and maybe that's a big part of the apathetic attitude.

    "A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in." -Greek Proverb

    ReplyDelete